Culture is a System: What leaders must do to align organizational culture and enable transformation

Transformation rarely fails because leaders lack ambition. More often, it fails because the formal organization and the informal organization are moving at different speeds.

John O. Burdett’s Cultural Alignment Model helps leaders see culture not as a statement of values, but as a system. It distinguishes between the formal culture – strategy, structure, processes, technology, and talent systems – and the informal culture: the stories, assumptions, levels of trust, and lived experiences that shape how people actually behave.

The work of leadership is to align the two.

Cultural Alignment model

In periods of transformation, leaders quickly turn to the language of culture. They speak about new values, new behaviors, new ways of working, and the need for people to “embrace change”. Their intention is sound, but the conversation is incomplete.

Too often, culture is treated as something that can be announced, cascaded, or refreshed. A new values statement is launched. A leadership framework is introduced. A transformation program is branded. A new operating model is communicated. Yet despite the energy invested, the organization does not move in the way leaders expect.

John Burdett’s model helps explain why.

Culture is not one thing. It is a system. And like any system, when one part changes, the rest of the system is affected. Introducing new organizational values, for example, without considering the broader cultural system can create unintended consequences.

That is why culture cannot be addressed only through the formal mechanisms of organizational life. Strategy, structure, processes, technology and talent management are essential – but they are only part of the picture. The informal culture – the beliefs, stories, assumptions, levels of trust and everyday experiences that shape how people really behave – is just as important. In the long term, it may be even more decisive.

The leadership challenge, therefore, is not simply to change culture. It is to create alignment between the formal and informal cultures of the organization.

The Formal Culture: What the Organization Designs

The formal culture is the visible, designed side of the organization. It includes the architecture leaders can most readily shape, communicate, and manage.

In John’s model, the formal culture includes strategic scenarios, a winning value proposition, challenging the status quo, organizational structure and agility, technology, speed of learning, key processes, DEI, and talent management.

During transformation, leaders typically reach for these levers to define strategic intent, redesign the organization, introduce new technologies, update processes, reset priorities and refresh talent systems.

This work is important. Without formal clarity, transformation lacks direction. People need to understand where the business is going, why it matters, and how the organization intends to compete and win.

But formal change alone rarely produces cultural change.

A new structure does not automatically create collaboration. A new technology platform does not automatically create adoption. A new set of values does not automatically create trust. A new talent process does not automatically create fairness.

This is where the informal culture becomes critical.

The Informal Culture: What People Experience

The informal culture is the lived experience of the organization. It is what people believe, repeat, remember and sense. It is carried through conversations, stories, habits, symbols and everyday decisions.

In the model, the informal culture includes language and metaphors, moving beyond past history and established myths, being fully informed and listened to, employee engagement, early involvement in the introduction of new technology, being part of a great team, learning and growth, felt-fair play, and the business’s reputation.

This is the culture people experience, rather than the culture leaders describe.

It is also where many transformation efforts stall.

Employees may understand the new strategy, but still be shaped by old assumptions. They may hear leaders talk about agility while experiencing slow decision-making. They may be told that learning is encouraged while seeing mistakes punished. They may be asked to adopt new technology, but feel excluded from the process of implementation. They may hear about fairness, but experience inconsistency.

In other words, the formal message and the informal reality can diverge.

When that happens, culture becomes a source of resistance – not because people are unwilling to change, but because the system is sending mixed signals.

The Alignment Space: Where Transformation Takes Hold

The most important part of the model is the space between formal and informal culture. This is the alignment zone – the point at which what the organization says, designs and measures is consistent with what people experience, believe and do.

John’s model identifies several features of this alignment space: shared purpose, customer focus, sense of belonging, organizational values, positive stories, building future readiness and resilience, fairness, and trust.

These are the conditions that allow transformation to take hold.

Shared purpose gives people a reason to move together. Customer focus connects internal change to external value. Belonging creates commitment. Values provide behavioral clarity. Positive stories reinforce what matters. Future readiness and resilience help the organization adapt. Fairness builds credibility. Trust allows people to engage with uncertainty, rather than retreat from it.

This is where culture becomes more than a statement. It becomes a capability.

An aligned culture helps people understand not only what is changing, but why it matters and how they are expected to contribute. It reduces friction. It increases confidence. It makes strategy more executable.

Why Alignment Matters During Transformation

Transformation creates pressure. It disrupts routines, challenges assumptions and often asks people to work differently before they feel ready. In that environment, any misalignment between formal and informal culture becomes more visible.

For example, when leaders talk about empowerment but decision-making rights remain unclear, people hesitate. When the organization invests in new technology without involving employees early, adoption slows. When agility is promoted but legacy processes remain, frustration grows. When values are refreshed but leaders behave inconsistently, cynicism increases. And when performance expectations rise but fairness is questioned, trust begins to erode.

The model therefore encourages leaders to look beyond individual culture initiatives. It asks them to examine the whole system:

These are not peripheral questions. They are central to transformation success.

The Common Platform: What Holds Alignment Together

At the base of the model is what John describes as the common platform. It consists of three elements: Managing the Business from the Outside In, Inspirational Leadership and Measurement.

This is a useful reminder that cultural alignment is not achieved through internal activity alone.

First, managing from the outside in ensures the organization’s culture is connected to the external environment. Culture should not be designed only around internal preferences. It must support the value proposition, customer expectations, market realities and future strategic scenarios.

Second, inspirational leadership is essential because alignment requires more than compliance. Leaders must create meaning, model the desired culture, and help people connect emotionally and practically with the direction of travel.

Third, measurement matters because culture cannot be left as an abstract aspiration. Leaders need to understand whether the formal and informal systems are reinforcing each other – and where gaps are emerging.

Without these three disciplines, culture risks becoming internally focused, leader-dependent, or impossible to track.

The Leadership Implication

The most important message for leaders: culture cannot be delegated to a program. Nor can it be reduced to communications, values statements, or engagement initiatives.

Culture is shaped by every meaningful signal in the organization – what leaders prioritize, what they measure, who gets promoted, how decisions are made, how people are treated, what stories are repeated, how customers are discussed, and whether the organization’s stated values are experienced as real.

During transformation, the leader’s task is to ensure these signals are coherent.

That means asking hard questions:

When leaders ask these questions, culture becomes less mysterious. It becomes something they can observe, discuss and influence.

Conclusion

John O. Burdett’s Cultural Alignment Model offers a timely reminder: transformation is not achieved by changing the formal organization alone. Nor is it achieved by focusing only on engagement, morale, or sentiment.

Sustainable transformation depends on alignment.

The formal culture must provide direction, structure and capability. The informal culture must create trust, belief and commitment. The alignment between the two is where shared purpose, customer focus, belonging, fairness, resilience and performance come together.

For leaders, the message is clear. Culture is not the backdrop to transformation. It is the system through which transformation either succeeds or fails.

Click here to download the Cultural Alignment model.

This article explores themes and concepts from content by John O. Burdett.

John O. Burdett is founder of Orxestra® Inc. He has extensive international experience as a senior executive. As a consultant he has worked in more than 40 countries for organisations that are household names. John has worked on organisation culture for some of the world’s largest organisations. His ongoing partnership with TRANSEARCH International means that his thought leading intellectual property, in any one year, supports talent management in many hundreds of organisations around the world. Get in touch with John O. Burdett »

You may also like